[UCLA-LUG] Configure sound card howto
Mark James Fasheh
mfasheh
Mon, 8 May 2000 14:02:59 -0700
Luis,
Try running (as root) the program sndconfig. Also, please refrain
from e-mailing us twice.
--Mark
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 09:39:03AM -0700, Luis wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone out there could help me out with setting up my
> sound card. I am running rd 6.2 other thing i don't know what kind of card
> i have.
>
>
>
> Luis
>
>
> At 07:13 AM 5/7/00 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >Send Linux mailing list submissions to
> > linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >
> >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the web, visit
> > http://linux.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux
> >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > linux-request@linux.ucla.edu
> >You can reach the person managing the list at
> > linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu
> >
> >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> >"Re: Contents of Linux digest..."
> >
> >
> >Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. RE: I Love You virus (chris)
> > 2. Re: I Love You virus (Ilan Rabinovitch)
> > 3. RE: I Love You virus (David Braginsky)
> > 4. RE: I Love You virus (dannys@csua.ucla.edu)
> > 5. RE: I Love You virus (Frederick Lee)
> >
> >--__--__--
> >
> >Message: 1
> >Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 01:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
> >From: chris <cbs@ucla.edu>
> >To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> >Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >
> >On Sun, 7 May 2000, David Braginsky wrote:
> >
> > > if by big brother you mean sendmail servers between you and the source.
> > > its sent clear text (most of the time) anyway
> >
> >no. by big brother i mean whoever you are trusting to set up your
> >database. for example, supposing that i offered to do it and showed you
> >credentials that led you to believe in my capabilities. and, maybe, 3 or
> >4 weeks into it, i start to filter out mail with whatever random keywords
> >i like. do you trust me not to do that?
> >
> >
> >-chris
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu [mailto:linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu]On
> > > > Behalf Of chris
> > > > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 1:32 AM
> > > > To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> > > > Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 7 May 2000, David Braginsky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > How about an extension to mail servers that allows blocking messages
> > > > > containing a certain bit pattern from being forwarded. This software
> > > > > could monitor an online database, and as soon as the virus is
> > discovered
> > > > > and added to the db, all enabled servers will no longer forward it. The
> > > > > same approach could be used with mail clients.
> > > >
> > > > you mean, invite big brother to inspect your mail?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >--__--__--
> >
> >Message: 2
> >Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 02:04:45 -0700
> >From: Ilan Rabinovitch <thefonz@fonz.net>
> >Reply-To: thefonz@fonz.net
> >To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >Subject: Re: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> >Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >
> >mike chan wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > the problem w/ bit patterns is that every forwarded email would still be
> > > different.. checking for the attachment might work, but your email server
> > > must support that functionality... =)
> >
> >Which popular mail servers have that functionality?
> >I know that Exchange needs 3rd part software to do it.
> >
> >Ilan
> >
> >
> >--__--__--
> >
> >Message: 3
> >Reply-To: <daveey@ucla.edu>
> >From: "David Braginsky" <daveey@ucla.edu>
> >To: <linux@linux.ucla.edu>
> >Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> >Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 02:12:20 -0700
> >charset="US-ASCII"
> >Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >
> >I trust macaffe to send me their virus definitions don't i?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu [mailto:linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu]On
> > > Behalf Of chris
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 1:41 AM
> > > To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> > > Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 7 May 2000, David Braginsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > if by big brother you mean sendmail servers between you and the source.
> > > > its sent clear text (most of the time) anyway
> > >
> > > no. by big brother i mean whoever you are trusting to set up your
> > > database. for example, supposing that i offered to do it and showed you
> > > credentials that led you to believe in my capabilities. and, maybe, 3 or
> > > 4 weeks into it, i start to filter out mail with whatever random keywords
> > > i like. do you trust me not to do that?
> > >
> > >
> > > -chris
> > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu [mailto:linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu]On
> > > > > Behalf Of chris
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 1:32 AM
> > > > > To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> > > > > Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 7 May 2000, David Braginsky wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > How about an extension to mail servers that allows blocking messages
> > > > > > containing a certain bit pattern from being forwarded. This software
> > > > > > could monitor an online database, and as soon as the virus
> > > is discovered
> > > > > > and added to the db, all enabled servers will no longer
> > > forward it. The
> > > > > > same approach could be used with mail clients.
> > > > >
> > > > > you mean, invite big brother to inspect your mail?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -chris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > UCLALUG Linux mailing list - Linux@linux.ucla.edu
> > > http://linux.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux
> > >
> >
> >
> >--__--__--
> >
> >Message: 4
> >Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 03:38:23 -0700
> >From: dannys@csua.ucla.edu
> >To: <linux@linux.ucla.edu>
> >Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> >Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >
> > >> >I feel that linux is ONE correct choice. MacOS is the another. While macs
> > >> >may be suceptible to SOME winblows virii, this is only because they can
> > >> >run M$ software. Funny how M$ propagates more virii than any other 'easy
> > >> >to use' OS.
> >
> >A friend of mine got the letter. He said that it was nothing more
> >than a VB script (though one that was somewhat intelligent...
> >apparently it looked in a number of addressbooks and such to get other
> >email addresses).
> >
> >Anyways, I was really dissapointed to hear that. Not only does one
> >have to intentionally click on the message. But, it's not even an
> >executable!
> >
> >And here it is, wiping out half the governments in the world...
> >
> >
> >--__--__--
> >
> >Message: 5
> >Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 04:37:20 -0700
> >From: Frederick Lee <phaethon@fire.csua.ucla.edu>
> >To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> >Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >
> >On Sun, 7 May 2000 03:38:23 -0700, said dannys@csua.ucla.edu:
> > >>> >I feel that linux is ONE correct choice. MacOS is the another. While
> > macs
> > >>> >may be suceptible to SOME winblows virii, this is only because they can
> > >>> >run M$ software. Funny how M$ propagates more virii than any other 'easy
> > >>> >to use' OS.
> > >
> > >A friend of mine got the letter. He said that it was nothing more
> > >than a VB script (though one that was somewhat intelligent...
> > >apparently it looked in a number of addressbooks and such to get other
> > >email addresses).
> > >
> > >Anyways, I was really dissapointed to hear that. Not only does one
> > >have to intentionally click on the message. But, it's not even an
> > >executable!
> > >
> > >And here it is, wiping out half the governments in the world...
> >
> >I was first aware of this listening to the Al Rantel Show on KABC radio, 790
> >AM, while driving to school. Within five minutes of tuning in, Al mentioned
> >macro language, MS-Word macro virus, and VBScript (sp?) so by the time I
> >arrived at UCLA, I already had the fortune of figuring out that the iloveyou
> >virus was a macro virus exploiting Microsoft Outlook's... um... features.
> >
> >I took it for granted that others knew it was a VBscript thingamabobber,
> >which kinda threw off a lot of my assumptions.
> >
> >And, anyway, being a Linux weenie, I figured that text code (e.g. macro) and
> >executable are the same. After all, it's just a single bit difference in
> >Unix, right?
> >
> >
> >-Fred
> >
> >
> >
> >--__--__--
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >UCLALUG Linux mailing list - Linux@linux.ucla.edu
> >http://linux.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux
> >
> >
> >End of Linux Digest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UCLALUG Linux mailing list - Linux@linux.ucla.edu
> http://linux.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux
--
--------------
If we were meant to get up early, God would have created us with alarm clocks.
President, UCLA LUG
Mark James Fasheh <mfasheh@linux.ucla.edu>
http://www.exothermic.org