[UCLA-LUG] Configure sound card howto
Luis
Luis@billingsupport.com
Mon, 08 May 2000 09:39:03 -0700
I was wondering if anyone out there could help me out with setting up my
sound card. I am running rd 6.2 other thing i don't know what kind of card
i have.
Luis
At 07:13 AM 5/7/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Send Linux mailing list submissions to
> linux@linux.ucla.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the web, visit
> http://linux.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> linux-request@linux.ucla.edu
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
>"Re: Contents of Linux digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. RE: I Love You virus (chris)
> 2. Re: I Love You virus (Ilan Rabinovitch)
> 3. RE: I Love You virus (David Braginsky)
> 4. RE: I Love You virus (dannys@csua.ucla.edu)
> 5. RE: I Love You virus (Frederick Lee)
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 01:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
>From: chris <cbs@ucla.edu>
>To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
>Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
>Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
>
>On Sun, 7 May 2000, David Braginsky wrote:
>
> > if by big brother you mean sendmail servers between you and the source.
> > its sent clear text (most of the time) anyway
>
>no. by big brother i mean whoever you are trusting to set up your
>database. for example, supposing that i offered to do it and showed you
>credentials that led you to believe in my capabilities. and, maybe, 3 or
>4 weeks into it, i start to filter out mail with whatever random keywords
>i like. do you trust me not to do that?
>
>
>-chris
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu [mailto:linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu]On
> > > Behalf Of chris
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 1:32 AM
> > > To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> > > Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 7 May 2000, David Braginsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > How about an extension to mail servers that allows blocking messages
> > > > containing a certain bit pattern from being forwarded. This software
> > > > could monitor an online database, and as soon as the virus is
> discovered
> > > > and added to the db, all enabled servers will no longer forward it. The
> > > > same approach could be used with mail clients.
> > >
> > > you mean, invite big brother to inspect your mail?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 02:04:45 -0700
>From: Ilan Rabinovitch <thefonz@fonz.net>
>Reply-To: thefonz@fonz.net
>To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
>Subject: Re: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
>Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
>
>mike chan wrote:
>
> >
> > the problem w/ bit patterns is that every forwarded email would still be
> > different.. checking for the attachment might work, but your email server
> > must support that functionality... =)
>
>Which popular mail servers have that functionality?
>I know that Exchange needs 3rd part software to do it.
>
>Ilan
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 3
>Reply-To: <daveey@ucla.edu>
>From: "David Braginsky" <daveey@ucla.edu>
>To: <linux@linux.ucla.edu>
>Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
>Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 02:12:20 -0700
>charset="US-ASCII"
>Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
>
>I trust macaffe to send me their virus definitions don't i?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu [mailto:linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu]On
> > Behalf Of chris
> > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 1:41 AM
> > To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> > Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 7 May 2000, David Braginsky wrote:
> >
> > > if by big brother you mean sendmail servers between you and the source.
> > > its sent clear text (most of the time) anyway
> >
> > no. by big brother i mean whoever you are trusting to set up your
> > database. for example, supposing that i offered to do it and showed you
> > credentials that led you to believe in my capabilities. and, maybe, 3 or
> > 4 weeks into it, i start to filter out mail with whatever random keywords
> > i like. do you trust me not to do that?
> >
> >
> > -chris
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu [mailto:linux-admin@linux.ucla.edu]On
> > > > Behalf Of chris
> > > > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 1:32 AM
> > > > To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
> > > > Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 7 May 2000, David Braginsky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > How about an extension to mail servers that allows blocking messages
> > > > > containing a certain bit pattern from being forwarded. This software
> > > > > could monitor an online database, and as soon as the virus
> > is discovered
> > > > > and added to the db, all enabled servers will no longer
> > forward it. The
> > > > > same approach could be used with mail clients.
> > > >
> > > > you mean, invite big brother to inspect your mail?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > UCLALUG Linux mailing list - Linux@linux.ucla.edu
> > http://linux.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux
> >
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 03:38:23 -0700
>From: dannys@csua.ucla.edu
>To: <linux@linux.ucla.edu>
>Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
>Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
>
> >> >I feel that linux is ONE correct choice. MacOS is the another. While macs
> >> >may be suceptible to SOME winblows virii, this is only because they can
> >> >run M$ software. Funny how M$ propagates more virii than any other 'easy
> >> >to use' OS.
>
>A friend of mine got the letter. He said that it was nothing more
>than a VB script (though one that was somewhat intelligent...
>apparently it looked in a number of addressbooks and such to get other
>email addresses).
>
>Anyways, I was really dissapointed to hear that. Not only does one
>have to intentionally click on the message. But, it's not even an
>executable!
>
>And here it is, wiping out half the governments in the world...
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 04:37:20 -0700
>From: Frederick Lee <phaethon@fire.csua.ucla.edu>
>To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
>Subject: RE: [UCLA-LUG] I Love You virus
>Reply-To: linux@linux.ucla.edu
>
>On Sun, 7 May 2000 03:38:23 -0700, said dannys@csua.ucla.edu:
> >>> >I feel that linux is ONE correct choice. MacOS is the another. While
> macs
> >>> >may be suceptible to SOME winblows virii, this is only because they can
> >>> >run M$ software. Funny how M$ propagates more virii than any other 'easy
> >>> >to use' OS.
> >
> >A friend of mine got the letter. He said that it was nothing more
> >than a VB script (though one that was somewhat intelligent...
> >apparently it looked in a number of addressbooks and such to get other
> >email addresses).
> >
> >Anyways, I was really dissapointed to hear that. Not only does one
> >have to intentionally click on the message. But, it's not even an
> >executable!
> >
> >And here it is, wiping out half the governments in the world...
>
>I was first aware of this listening to the Al Rantel Show on KABC radio, 790
>AM, while driving to school. Within five minutes of tuning in, Al mentioned
>macro language, MS-Word macro virus, and VBScript (sp?) so by the time I
>arrived at UCLA, I already had the fortune of figuring out that the iloveyou
>virus was a macro virus exploiting Microsoft Outlook's... um... features.
>
>I took it for granted that others knew it was a VBscript thingamabobber,
>which kinda threw off a lot of my assumptions.
>
>And, anyway, being a Linux weenie, I figured that text code (e.g. macro) and
>executable are the same. After all, it's just a single bit difference in
>Unix, right?
>
>
>-Fred
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>_______________________________________________
>UCLALUG Linux mailing list - Linux@linux.ucla.edu
>http://linux.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux
>
>
>End of Linux Digest