[UCLA-LUG] kodiak linux roadmap :)
Dimi Shahbaz
dimator@fire.csua.ucla.edu
Sun, 31 Oct 1999 11:35:07 -0800 (PST)
> project, and got nowhere. Someone should try KDevelop and let us know (I
> don't have KDE). As for me, I think we should put both on the CD.
> --Mark
>
I have been using KDevelop for while. I like it because it has all the
classview hierarchy found in VC, which can be very helpful in huge
projects with tens of files. In addition, it has plentiful
*searchable* documentation, all in perty HTML. A lot of this is QT/KDE
specific, but a built-in C++ reference is also available. The only thing
I don't like about Kdevelop is the editor, which is based on KWrite. It
has syntax highlighting and all that good stuff, but I guess I'm too used
to vi. :) It is perfect for the newbies though, as VC's editor was for
me when I was starting out.
I agree that putting both IDE's on the cd is a good idea. As long as
there's a visible link to both of them, users will make their own decision
as to which they like better.