[UCLA-LUG] kodiak linux roadmap :)

Dimi Shahbaz dimator@fire.csua.ucla.edu
Sun, 31 Oct 1999 11:35:07 -0800 (PST)


> project, and got nowhere.  Someone should try KDevelop and let us know (I
> don't have KDE).  As for me, I think we should put both on the CD.
> 	--Mark
> 

I have been using KDevelop for while.  I like it because it has all the
classview hierarchy found in VC, which can be very helpful in huge
projects with tens of files. In addition, it has plentiful
*searchable* documentation, all in perty HTML. A lot of this is QT/KDE
specific, but a built-in C++ reference is also available.  The only thing
I don't like about Kdevelop is the editor, which is based on KWrite.  It
has syntax highlighting and all that good stuff, but I guess I'm too used
to vi. :)  It is perfect for the newbies though, as VC's editor was for
me when I was starting out.

I agree that putting both IDE's on the cd is a good idea.  As long as
there's a visible link to both of them, users will make their own decision
as to which they like better.